The Fair Housing Act
Secure.gov sites use HTTPS
A lock (Lock Locked padlock) or https:// indicates you have actually safely connected to the.gov site. Share delicate details only on official, safe sites.
- About - The Attorney general of the United States
- Organizational Chart
- Budget & Performance
- History
- Privacy Program
- Press Releases
- Speeches
- Videos
- Photo Galleries
- Blogs
- Podcasts
- Guidance Documents
- Forms
- Publications
- Information for Victims in Large Cases
- Justice Manual
- Business and Contracts
- Why Justice?
- Benefits
- DOJ Vacancies
- Legal Careers at DOJ
Utilities
- About About
Our Work
- Contact the Division Contact the Division
Report a Violation
- Cases and Matters
- Press Room Press Room
Videos
Publications
- Employment Opportunities Employment Opportunities
Experienced Professionals
Attorney general of the United States ´ s Honors Program
Volunteer and Paid Student Internship Programs
- Civil Rights FOIA Civil Rights FOIA
Emmett Till Act/Cold Case Memoranda
- En español
- About - title=" About" About
- The Attorney General
- Organizational Chart
- Budget & Performance
- History
- Privacy Program
- title=" News" News
- Press Releases
- Speeches
- Videos
- Photo Galleries
- Blogs
- Podcasts
- title=" Guidance & Resources" Resources
- Guidance Documents
- Forms
- Publications
- Information for Victims in Large Cases
- Justice Manual
- Business and Contracts
- Employment
- Why Justice?
- Benefits
- DOJ Vacancies
- Legal Careers at DOJ
- Our Offices
- Find Help
- Contact Us
Breadcrumb
1. Justice.gov
2. Civil Rights Division
3. The Fair Housing Act
The Fair Housing Act
- Facebook
- X.
- LinkedIn.
- Email
The Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. 3601 et seq., restricts discrimination by direct companies of housing, such as proprietors and real estate business in addition to other entities, such as towns, banks or other loaning institutions and property owners insurance companies whose prejudiced practices make housing not available to individuals due to the fact that of:
race or color.
faith.
sex.
nationwide origin.
familial status, or.
impairment.
In cases including discrimination in mortgage loans or home improvement loans, the Department might file suit under both the Fair Housing Act and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act. The Department brings cases where there is proof of a pattern or practice of discrimination or where a denial of rights to a group of persons raises a concern of public importance. Where force or threat of force is utilized to reject or hinder fair housing rights, the Department of Justice may institute criminal procedures. The Fair Housing Act also supplies procedures for handling specific grievances of discrimination. Individuals who believe that they have been victims of a prohibited housing practice, might file a problem with the Department of Housing and Urban Development [HUD] or file their own suit in federal or state court. The Department of Justice brings suits on behalf of individuals based on referrals from HUD.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Race or Color
One of the central objectives of the Fair Housing Act, when Congress enacted it in 1968, was to prohibit race discrimination in sales and rentals of housing. Nevertheless, more than 30 years later on, race discrimination in housing continues to be an issue. The majority of the Justice Department's pattern or practice cases include claims of race discrimination. Sometimes, housing providers attempt to disguise their discrimination by providing false info about schedule of housing, either saying that nothing was readily available or steering homeseekers to particular locations based on race. Individuals who receive such false info or misdirection may have no understanding that they have actually been victims of discrimination. The Department of Justice has actually brought lots of cases declaring this kind of discrimination based upon race or color. In addition, the Department's Fair Housing Testing Program seeks to discover this type of concealed discrimination and hold those responsible liable. Most of the mortgage loaning cases brought by the Department under the Fair Housing Act and Equal Credit Opportunity Act have alleged discrimination based upon race or color. Some of the Department's cases have actually likewise declared that municipalities and other city government entities breached the Fair Housing Act when they denied authorizations or zoning modifications for housing developments, or relegated them to mainly minority areas, since the prospective homeowners were expected to be primarily African-Americans.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Religion
The Fair Housing Act prohibits discrimination in housing based upon religion. This prohibition covers circumstances of overt discrimination against members of a specific religion too less direct actions, such as zoning regulations developed to restrict the usage of private homes as a locations of praise. The variety of cases submitted given that 1968 alleging religious discrimination is small in comparison to some of the other prohibited bases, such as race or national origin. The Act does include a limited exception that allows non-commercial housing run by a spiritual organization to reserve such housing to persons of the exact same religion.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Sex, Including Unwanted Sexual Advances
The Fair Housing Act makes it unlawful to discriminate in housing on the basis of sex. In recent years, the Department's focus in this location has actually been to challenge sexual harassment in housing. Women, particularly those who are poor, and with restricted housing options, typically have little option but to tolerate the humiliation and degradation of unwanted sexual advances or threat having their families and themselves eliminated from their homes. The Department's enforcement program is focused on proprietors who develop an illogical living environment by demanding sexual favors from occupants or by producing a sexually hostile environment for them. In this manner we look for both to get relief for renters who have actually been treated unfairly by a landlord due to the fact that of sex and likewise prevent other possible abusers by making it clear that they can not continue their conduct without dealing with consequences. In addition, rates discrimination in mortgage loaning may also negatively affect females, especially minority ladies. This kind of discrimination is illegal under both the Fair Housing Act and Equal Credit Opportunity Act.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon National Origin
The Fair Housing Act prohibits discrimination based upon national origin. Such can be based either upon the country of a person's birth or where his/her ancestors stem. Census information indicate that the Hispanic population is the fastest growing segment of our nation's population. The Justice Department has taken enforcement action versus local governments that have actually tried to decrease or limit the variety of Hispanic households that may live in their communities. We have actually taken legal action against loan providers under both the Fair Housing Act and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act when they have imposed more rigid underwriting requirements on mortgage or made loans on less beneficial terms for Hispanic debtors. The Department has likewise taken legal action against lending institutions for discrimination versus Native Americans. Other locations of the nation have experienced an increasing diversity of national origin groups within their populations. This consists of brand-new immigrants from Southeastern Asia, such as the Hmong, the former Soviet Union, and other portions of Eastern Europe. We have actually done something about it against private property managers who have discriminated against such individuals.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Familial Status
The Fair Housing Act, with some exceptions, prohibits discrimination in housing against families with kids under 18. In addition to forbiding a straight-out rejection of housing to families with kids, the Act likewise prevents housing suppliers from imposing any special requirements or conditions on renters with custody of kids. For example, property owners may not locate families with children in any single part of a complex, position an unreasonable limitation on the overall variety of individuals who may live in a home, or restrict their access to recreational services provided to other occupants. In the majority of instances, the amended Fair Housing Act restricts a housing company from refusing to rent or offer to families with kids. However, some facilities may be designated as Housing for Older Persons (55 years of age). This type of housing, which satisfies the requirements set forth in the Housing for Older Persons Act of 1995, might operate as "senior" housing. The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) has actually published policies and additional guidance detailing these statutory requirements.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Disability
The Fair Housing Act restricts discrimination on the basis of disability in all kinds of housing transactions. The Act specifies individuals with a disability to indicate those individuals with psychological or physical impairments that significantly restrict one or more significant life activities. The term psychological or physical disability might consist of conditions such as blindness, hearing problems, movement impairment, HIV infection, psychological retardation, alcoholism, drug dependency, persistent tiredness, finding out impairment, head injury, and psychological illness. The term significant life activity might include seeing, hearing, strolling, breathing, carrying out manual tasks, caring for one's self, discovering, speaking, or working. The Fair Housing Act also secures persons who have a record of such a disability, or are considered as having such a disability. Current users of prohibited illegal drugs, individuals convicted for prohibited manufacture or circulation of an illegal drug, sex culprits, and juvenile wrongdoers are not considered disabled under the Fair Housing Act, by virtue of that status. The Fair Housing Act pays for no protections to individuals with or without disabilities who provide a direct danger to the individuals or residential or commercial property of others. Determining whether someone positions such a direct danger should be made on an individualized basis, however, and can not be based on basic assumptions or speculation about the nature of an impairment. The Division's enforcement of the Fair Housing Act's defenses for persons with impairments has actually focused on two major areas. One is insuring that zoning and other regulations concerning land usage are not utilized to prevent the domestic options of these individuals, consisting of unnecessarily restricting common, or congregate, residential plans, such as group homes. The 2nd area is guaranteeing that newly constructed multifamily housing is integrated in accordance with the Fair Housing Act's ease of access requirements so that it is accessible to and functional by individuals with disabilities, and, in specific, those who utilize wheelchairs. There are other federal statutes that restrict discrimination versus individuals with specials needs, consisting of the Americans with Disabilities Act, which is imposed by the Disability Rights Section of the Civil Rights Division.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Disability Group Homes
Some individuals with disabilities may cohabit in congregate living arrangements, frequently described as "group homes." The Fair Housing Act restricts municipalities and other local federal government entities from making zoning or land use decisions or implementing land use policies that exclude or otherwise discriminate versus people with specials needs. The Fair Housing Act makes it unlawful--
- To use land usage policies or actions that deal with groups of individuals with impairments less favorably than groups of non-disabled individuals. An example would be an ordinance forbiding housing for persons with impairments or a particular type of special needs, such as mental disorder, from finding in a particular location, while allowing other groups of unassociated individuals to live together in that area.
- To do something about it against, or deny a license, for a home since of the special needs of people who live or would live there. An example would be rejecting a building authorization for a home since it was intended to supply housing for persons with psychological retardation.
- To decline to make reasonable accommodations in land usage and zoning policies and procedures where such lodgings may be needed to afford persons or groups of individuals with disabilities a level playing field to utilize and take pleasure in housing. What constitutes an affordable lodging is a case-by-case decision. Not all asked for modifications of guidelines or policies are affordable. If a requested adjustment imposes an unnecessary financial or administrative burden on a local government, or if a modification produces an essential modification in a local federal government's land use and zoning plan, it is not a "affordable" lodging.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Disability-- Accessibility Features for New Construction
The Fair Housing Act specifies discrimination in housing against persons with specials needs to include a failure "to create and construct" certain brand-new multi-family homes so that they are available to and functional by individuals with disabilities, and particularly people who utilize wheelchairs. The Act requires all freshly constructed multi-family residences of four or more units meant for first tenancy after March 13, 1991, to have particular features: an available entrance on an accessible route, accessible common and public use locations, doors sufficiently large to accommodate wheelchairs, available paths into and through each home, light switches, electric outlets, and thermostats in accessible area, reinforcements in bathroom walls to accommodate grab bar setups, and usable bathroom and kitchens configured so that a wheelchair can maneuver about the area.
Developers, builders, owners, and architects responsible for the style or building and construction of brand-new multi-family housing might be held responsible under the Fair Housing Act if their buildings stop working to satisfy these design requirements. The Department of Justice has actually brought numerous enforcement actions against those who failed to do so. The majority of the cases have been fixed by approval decrees providing a variety of kinds of relief, including: retrofitting to bring inaccessible features into compliance where possible and where it is not-- options (financial funds or other building and construction requirements) that will attend to making other housing units accessible; training on the availability requirements for those associated with the building procedure; a mandate that all new housing projects adhere to the ease of access requirements, and monetary relief for those injured by the infractions. In addition, the Department has actually sought to promote ease of access through building regulations.
